 |
|
 |
 |
#253640 - 30/07/12 02:14 PM
Re: Are we obsessed with 4-3-3?
[Re: ]
|
thundyr
Unregistered
|
I dont go along with all these formation stuff, it's all about if your best 11 plays better than your opponents best 11. This explains an awful lot about your posts.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
#253675 - 30/07/12 03:55 PM
Re: Are we obsessed with 4-3-3?
[Re: ]
|
Member
Registered: 11/03/11
Posts: 1836
|
I think the "obsession" with 4-3-3 is that it is extremely flexible as you can flow between 4-5-1, 4-2-3-1, 4-3-3, and 4-2-4 without needing different players. The demands on the wingers are high, which means one tends to have exciting players in those roles so the football is also extremely watchable. 3 midfielders to dominate a traditional 2, 3 forwards to stretch a traditional back 4, a DM to break up play or fall back into a back 3, wingbacks set to attack, defending from the front - these are the tools for destroying the majority of sides that play "The English Way".
I also happen to feel that 4-3-3 is the best way to get the best out of Suarez and Carroll.
There is no reason whatsoever to be apprehensive about playing 4-3-3! Fully agree thundyr, fluid system defending f,rom the front and attacking from the back, with all eleven players. So fluid that the formation is constantly evolving, forming and reforming, having started as 1,2,1,2,2,2,1 very difficult to play against when we'll organised with each player knowing the movement, patterns and the rotation.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
#253803 - 30/07/12 08:13 PM
Re: Are we obsessed with 4-3-3?
[Re: ]
|
longmoorlane
Unregistered
|
I dont go along with all these formation stuff, it's all about if your best 11 plays better than your opponents best 11. This explains an awful lot about your posts. 'Football is a simple game based on the giving and taking of passes, of controlling the ball and of making yourself available to receive a pass. It is terribly simple.' Bill Shanks... I rest my case, glad this clears things up regardaing all this formation nonesense, pity i have to put some people back in there places in order to prove a point, but nevermind...
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|